Ollie Swap

Reviews

• 1/5
  $5K-10KValid Order
  I sent 0.07239361 BTC - It confirmed on chain. Status stayed CONFIRMING then bc1q9cr9nz4xt3atpeprcge8cf2k9auxj47vdt4fsw they changed the btc wallet after i sent. i was scammed!!!! please help me!!!!! i only get picture, they are scammer!!!! do not use!!!!
  
  http://ollieswap3326bz5qksmarnytpiyeceeuq33sb26noc7hd6by6ib4fyd.onion/en/swap/4Snqa2jnNLRz
  
  they edit order id everything!!!! i was shocked what happend until check i see it. SCAMMERRSSS!!!!
  
  https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/3947533fd0daffb85961767b3969e71561f2ff0de096a1193aeed73d9b8c400f
  Author: 4AD1…3F61 (posts: 1) • 2026-08-23
  Reply
  
  

  Replies

  • ✓ Response from Ollie Swap
    Hi,
    
    Thanks for reaching out. We're sorry to hear about your experience, but we have to disagree with the claim as stated.
    
    On every swap page we publish a PGP key and a "PGP Signed Version" button. That signature is generated before the deposit address is shown to the sender and covers the entire swap details — order ID, deposit address, amounts, everything. It is cryptographically bound to our key, so it cannot be silently edited after the fact.
    
    You mention that "they changed the BTC wallet after I sent" and "they edit order id everything." We'd like to verify that claim. Could you please provide:
    
    The two PGP-signed versions of swap 4Snqa2jnNLRz — the one you saw at the moment you sent, and the one you see now.
    Both signatures should verify as valid against our public key (it's on the project page).
    A timestamp or screenshot showing you had the first version before the broadcast of tx 3947533f….
    
    If the address genuinely changed between those two signatures, we'll take full responsibility and make it right. But without those two valid signatures there's no cryptographic evidence of tampering — just a unilateral statement.
    
    We respond to all disputes through the same page you linked; the swap state, our signature, and the on-chain tx are all verifiable by anyone. We'd rather resolve this on the page than in a comment thread.
    
    We're happy to look into it further if you can share the signed versions. Until then, we can't accept the "scammer" label on the basis of a screenshot without the PGP proof.
    
    — Ollie's Swap team
    Author: Ollie Swap (posts: 2) • 2026-10-26
• 1/5
  javascript is mandatory, why even put this crap on tor? cmon...
  Author: AE5E…4A37 (posts: 1) • 2026-06-26
  Reply
  
  

  Replies

  • ✓ Response from Ollie Swap
    Hello, both our websites are developed without JavaScript and have a strict NO JS/NO LOGS policy. If you'd like to leave a review, please try it out, attach your exchange, and let me know what you think, or at least open it.
    
    Got a question? Leave it below; I’ll catch the thread personally. See you on the web.
    — Your Ollie
    Author: Ollie Swap (posts: 2) • 2026-07-08